Evolving Character Creation

Drowning In DiceDo you want to know a geeky little secret that I swore to carry to the grave, but which I’ve slowly come to terms with as I realised we geeks now rule the world? I have a memory from when I was a kid (we’re talking way back here, when dinosaurs ruled the earth and a certain clown-fronted fast food joint actually cooked the food before serving it to you) of a die clattering across the floor, and whenever I see someone rolling dice this memory comes back to me in glorious high definition. I remember the number being rolled, and then I’d add six to it and scribble it down on a piece of paper that was covered in boxes. The paper had a hastily copied version of the character sheets from the fantasy game books that were popular at the time; books I’d played so often that I needed to make copies of the sheets, otherwise I’d destroy them with constant erasing and writing in.

It’s funny that whenever I try to bring forth a memory of an event in those books it’s always that scene of character creation which comes to me, rather than a specific part of the plot or a phrase that has stuck with me. That was my first experience of the freedom of character creation: the ability to become someone else rather than the overweight kid that was my unfortunate reality at the time; imagining myself as a heroic, muscled barbarian or graceful elf and putting the pertinent details down on paper. Of course, then I discovered girls and a different type of role playing, but this isn’t the place for that story as this is an article about a different type of gaming altogether.

Ahem, moving swiftly on, as you can imagine it comes as no surprise to me that character creation is one of the few things to have successfully made the move from pen and paper role playing games to videogames. The sheer thrill of creating another identity can never be underestimated and, combined with the ability that this feature gives players to put themselves (or slightly mutated movie stars) inside the narrative provided by games, this is a feature that will never really die out.

Think about it, who would you rather depend upon to save the world from a zombie invasion: a guy who can’t walk without getting stuck against a wall and who ends up running in place, or a guy who looks a little like a camp version of you, but who still can’t walk without getting stuck against a wall and running in place? Yeah, I’d pick the special needs version of myself every time too. He kicks zombie ass, although he is still a little intimidated by any version of an undead dog.

Strength = 2d6+4

Character creation is here to stay, but that doesn’t mean it hasn’t changed over time and that it won‘t change more. In the grand scope of things it wasn’t that long ago that character creation first moved over from pen and paper to the digital medium. The first games to do so were M.U.Ds (Multi-User Dungeons – think of them as the text-based grandfathers of World Of Warcraft and also the most advanced games of their time), which usually had players roll their characters at home and type their rolled attributes into the game. Of course, this led to rampant cheating across the board as people suddenly had godlike characters who possessed perfect stats “purely by chance“. Seriously, you couldn’t gain such power if you got bitten by a radioactive horse (change the animal from a spider, we can‘t afford a lawsuit – ed.), after falling in toxic waste and finding a mystical hammer. As time went on the character creation systems started to be built into the games so that everybody could see what numbers the random number generator came up with and the game could be a bit more balanced for all people. Of course this is all before my time as I may have slightly exaggerated my age at the beginning of this article.

My first experience of a computerised character creation system came with 1988’s Pool Of Radiance, a true gem of its time that brought the worlds of the Advanced Dungeons & Dragons game to life for me. I mean, just look at those wonderful graphics over there and you’ll see what I mean. Hey, it was the best we had back then, okay? It even won the “Best Fantasy or Science Fiction Computer Game of 1988” Origins award. Bloody whippersnappers don’t know they’re born with their ten second loading waits and realistic graphics…

The game was one of the better examples of an adventure game in its time and it allowed you to create a party of adventurers who would face off against the evils of the world. Character creation was pretty simple: you could choose the alignment, race, gender and character class of each of your six party members and that was pretty much it. It’s a far cry from today’s systems but in the eyes of a ten year old boy who hadn’t quite discovered that girls weren’t icky yet, it was an amazingly complex system with oodles of room for experimentation. All of the attributes in the system were randomly generated although the game also gave the option to re-roll if you ended up with a lame character.

This type of system was available in most of the games that followed Pool Of Radiance and tried to milk its success, but they all still carried over a problem that had been present since the early M.U.D days, as players could re-roll attributes for as long as they wanted until they ended up with a Superman who could waltz through the game. What developers needed was some way to balance character creation out, a way to take the random element out of it once and for all.

What Do Points Make? Prizes Characters!!!

Thanks for that header there Brucie, your cheque’s in the mail. You don’t mind if I adjust it a little do you?

Rather than coming up with their own way to evolve character creation, game developers turned back to pen and paper games and took note of the new trend happening there. Rather than creating characters by dice rolls, gamers were starting to use a pool of points and allocate those between a set of attributes and this was exactly what video game developers had been looking for, as it allowed them to balance characters from the outset of the game, ensuring that no one character would be able to perfectly handle every situation that the game threw at them.

That was the plan anyway, but games were still pretty simplistic dungeon crawling affairs back then so it really just meant that players stuffed everything they could into combat abilities and ignored things like Charisma that had no real role. We still had plenty of radioactive horse-men running around the field and destroying everything in their path, but the new points based system brought something else with it despite the continued lack of balance: choice.

Rather than letting a random number decide what sort of character you were going to be, games now allowed you to place points into stats that suited your playing style. While this didn’t make much of an impact back then (as we all chose pure warriors due to the way the games were set up) it did give us our first taste of truly creating a character to our own designs, something that would be a driving force in RPGs as time went on. The points system is still the standard in character creation systems, though the games have arguably become more interesting and can throw more complex situations at the player, so every attribute is equally useful now. An offshoot of the points system is the personality test where the player is asked questions about what their character would do in certain situations and the answers they give determine where the points are allocated. Personally I’ve never found this to work for me as there’s always something I want to reassign afterwards, but it’s an interesting way to take the number crunching out of the system.

Creating Avatars (No, Not The Giant Smurfs)

Having seen in their sales figures the obvious reaction to allowing the player more choice in the character creation process, developers began to look for other ways to let players influence who their character was. Their latest solution was found not in games this time, but in books. The popular Cyberpunk genre had, for a long time, talked of people creating characters to represent themselves in games and on the web and this was the latest step taken by developers to allow gamers more control over who they would become.

For the first time, players could create crude images of their characters from bits and pieces, and those characters would show up as created in the games. While systems like this had been tried in the past, it was only when they were married with the points-based creation systems that they really took hold of players’ imaginations. Gamers could create the look of a character and then spend points to allow them to live up to their image, something we’ve been doing ever since.

These two methods of character creation are even starting to be married together so that how you look affects what you can do. One example of this is the WWE series of games, where larger characters can’t be picked up and slammed by smaller ones. Another is the upcoming shooter Brink where larger characters have more health, but are slower, while small characters are faster, but have less health. While this method is still in its infancy and hasn’t yet allowed for stats that are completely based on how the character looks, it is an interesting concept and can only evolve further.

It was this addition that allowed character creation to make its leap from role playing games to other genres, starting with sports franchises. Specialised character creation systems showed up over time that allowed players to create their perfect snowboarding dude or wrestler, rather than a dwarf or halfling, and players of those sorts of games responded to this, just as players of RPGs had when the system had first shown up. Character creation was the big thing of the 90s and it was here to stay. Now we’ve reached a point where a game with a large enough budget (Dragon Age: Origins, The Sims, Spore) can release its character creation system ahead of the main game to allow players to really get everything the way they want it with their characters, and expect to make a profit on the release, which is quite sad when you look at it that way.

The Problem With Character Creation

And finally we reach the point of this article – the problem with character creation. As the systems get more and more complex, allowing more realistic representations of characters, those characters seem more out of place in the worlds in which they exist. Basically, the more variables the system has to offer, the more generalities the game uses to describe the character and that breaks immersion, unless of course you’re one of those who fully believes in worlds full of people called “stranger” who wander around helping people. No? Me neither. It breaks my suspension of disbelief just enough to grate on my nerves. I’d much rather take the guy who runs into walls and doesn’t look like me if they’re gonna call me “adventurer”.

Unsurprisingly, for something still viewed as a hardcore RPG element, it’s Bioware who have come to the rescue with what can only be described as a conditional character creation system. Starting with the Mass Effect series, but now moving over to their Dragon Age franchise (much to the annoyance of many existing Dragon Age fans), Bioware cut down the freedom of character creation a little so that characters would fit more naturally into the narrative. While you can still pick your character class, species is predetermined as human. Your stats can be set, you can change the way you look and you can even name your character, but that character will have a set surname which never changes.

These small concessions allow more realistic interactions with other characters in the world, as they refer to your character by the preset surname rather than the clichés of “hero” or “adventurer”. That one small change helps us as players to feel a part of the world, rather than an intruder in it. Interactions that might have previously been designed in multiple ways to cope with a number of races (one of the big selling points of the first Dragon Age) can just be written as though a human were involved with them, freeing the development team up to make more interactions, rather than multiple versions of the same one, and this can only be a good thing for players as we end up with a larger game containing more things to do. Gotta give it to Bioware, they may have lost popularity amongst the few who were determined not to be human, but they’ve married an extensive character creation system to a compelling narrative for possibly the first time in history.

From that first die roll back when I was so small I needed both hands to throw the dice, all the way up to current systems, I’ve loved character creation in games and I know I’m not alone. In a world where people will spend money to get an advance copy of the character creation system so that they can spend the months up until the game’s release defining every detail of how the character they’ll mostly be seeing the back of in the game looks, I’m not so alone. Even the consoles we play games on have incorporated character creation systems into their software to great effect (read this as profit if you’re a cynic like me) this generation.

Character creation has a defined place in games and the process is getting more and more streamlined as time goes on, and developers are stealing “being inspired by“ one another’s ideas. I can see a future not far off, where a system like Kinect scans us and assigns physical traits to our characters based on how we look (you’d better start working out now if you want that strength bonus, kids) then asks a few questions to fill in the rest of the details. Of course that system itself has drawbacks, and the amount of sites that give details on how to create versions of movie stars that just never look quite right would dwindle away to nothing, but you can’t please everyone, eh? At least then it may be possible to actually create someone who really looks like me.

Now, if they could just do something about the constant running against a wall…

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Evolving Character Creation

  1. And there we have my entry for the GamingLives writing competition that got joint third place. Not my best obviously, but still a fun little look at an often neglected part of gaming.

  2. Now that we have gotten to know eachother as online characters ;), I feel I can be honest with you. This said, I agree with you on the point that this is not the best story I have read from your pen. Good, but not the best. The other day, we talked about how a writer's personality will colour what he writes, and I recognize too little of The Furie in this text. You might have done it deliberately, which is okay, but I miss The Furie touch. I take it I don't have to explain this for you, since I am pretty sure you know what I mean.The longest time I have had a video game character stuck in a wall, running in one place, was some fifteen years ago when I was playing a Mickey Mouse arcade game, forgot the name, but it followed the mouse from the Steamboat Willie days up to present time. He got stuck on a level, in the wall, and I left the room with everything still on, forgot all about it, and it was next day's morning before I opened the door to my study – and there Mickey was, still running in place, stuck in the wall – 7-8 hours later.I actually felt guilty.

  3. It was my entry for a competition and mostly written with that in mind, which probably coloured the writing and made it different from when I know I'm just going to publish here. Still, to counteract that I entered another one that was totally written for this place, and they both hit the top ten. Win win in my eyes. 😀

  4. Ah, memories of Fighting Fantasy :happy:. Back when boasting of stats like 12-24-12 didn't sound a bit naughty…it just meant you'd cheated :pI enjoyed reading this 😀 Although I spent part of it thinking "oh, what about such-and-such a game?"I like the Fallout style rather than Bioware's, personally. Maybe I'm just in it for the weird perks :left:

  5. With so many games using character creation I'd have had another massive article on my hands if I'd tried to list all the intricacies that have been brought in. As I'd already submitted my Building A Better Sandbox article (top ten in the competition but didn't quite place in the winners circle) I thought it best to go for a medium sized look at this.One thing I'll give to Fallout, particularly New Vegas is the perks but they fall more under the realm of evolving your character than creating it. New Vegas takes things to extremes. You get a new chosen perk every two levels, some missions give perks at the end, companions give you perks, and there are challenges (mini things like kill X amount of enemies, use X amount of chems) that occasionally drop a perk to show how used to the wasteland you're becoming. They really give a feeling of the character growing over time in a way that an experience system fails to.In fact, now that I think back to the levelling system I came up with based on the Fable games, it works in a similar way.

  6. I've been playing New Vegas for a couple of weeks now. It's enjoyable, but it's not really any different to Fallout 3. Not that I expected it to change radically :p The original Fallout was possibly the first game I got into like this…and the fact that Fallout 2 was bugged to shit probably stopped me getting many more like it.

  7. I've been playing with the faction system and it really does change the game up (as well as fill it with more bugs than you can shake a freshly slaughtered cat at). It feels smaller and a little more personal than it actually is, and a second playthrough just shows you what you've been missing out on as entire questlines appear that you didn't know about and other entry points to quests become apparent.Just played the first DLC for it and, while it's a good expansion, it's a little too samey at the beginning. It's about five hours long with two or three of those spent in a red mist that makes everything look the same.

Have Your Say:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s